Teams

WTF (Women Tennis Friends)

2023 Howard Columbia Adult Other Spring Weekday Women · Howard Columbia 18 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-14vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Henley / Lauren Murray vs Bonnie Catalano / Laura Hieronymus7-6, 4-2
2023-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesPam Henley / Lenora Spencer vs Debbie Wall / Diane Butler6-4, 6-1
2023-06-02vs Serves you rightWon 20
W#1 DoublesLenora Spencer / Donna Jones vs Roslyn Waddy / Madison Muneses6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPam Henley / Casey Royster vs Doris Zingman / Miyeon Jeon6-1, 6-1
2023-05-22vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesPam Henley / Cathie Boarman vs Andrea Smolen / April Wilmer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-17vs Good Morning Princess 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKara Jones / Lenora Spencer vs Arianne Monroe / Ngocdung Hoang6-3, 6-3
2023-05-12vs Serves you rightWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Jones / Lenora Spencer vs Laura Violand / Doris Zingman2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-28vs Serves you rightWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Henley / Lynne Borkowski vs Dami Schlobohm / Miyeon Jeon6-1, 6-3
2023-04-17vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Henley / Kara Jones vs Bonnie Catalano / Sophia Crawley7-6, 6-3
2023-04-03vs Serves you rightLost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Henley / Lynne Borkowski vs Rise Lancoon / Denise Browne6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Casey Royster
published 3.5
2.80
Lenora Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Donna Jones
published
2.54
Christine Baehr
published 3
2.52
Pam Henley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Cathie Boarman
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Henley + Lenora Spencer3645% gamesnot enough data
Casey Royster + Lenora Spencer2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Lenora Spencer
300W–174L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Donna Jones
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Christine Baehr
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Pam Henley
49W–88L career · 7 lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cathie Boarman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.