Teams

HHTL55/Lieberman/SPCC

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs LLAS UPTA55A/Kim/SportsclubWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Green / Jay Tiedeman vs Joo Ho Kim / Steve Miller6-0, 6-2
2025-05-18vs LLAS UPTA55A/WeinerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Kolaric / Al Cannon vs Timothy Stewart / John Jennings6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShawn Oliver / Gabriel Fornari vs Belton Thomason / Andrew Weiner6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / James Demos vs Barney Pannell / Lee Chapman6-2, 6-2
2025-05-17vs LCTA55/Viljac/MPRDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Kevin Green vs Richard Owens / Will Smith7-5, 6-1
2025-05-17vs BBTL55/Ravens/Rose Hill TLCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lieberman / James Demos vs Robert Tillison / John Brittis6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Oliver / Gabriel Fornari vs Anthony Brittis / Steve Simone6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeter Kolaric / Al Cannon vs Michael Mitchell / Thomas McEvoy6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Daniel Lieberman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.50
Gabriel Fornari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.50
Michael Starke
published
4.36
Jay Tiedeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.35
Steve Pittman
published
James Demos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Peter Kolaric
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shawn Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Oliver + Gabriel Fornari303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Lieberman
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Gabriel Fornari
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
Michael Starke
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Jay Tiedeman
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
Steve Pittman
37W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
James Demos
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Kolaric
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Oliver
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.