Teams

KF.Collins

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Madeline Cambo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobyn Merck / Tara Navarro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-14vs TOC.BarcinasWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobyn Merck / Melanie Taylor vs Angela Ray / Suzanne Ruggles3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-07vs ACP.TandradinataLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Robyn Merck vs Molly Andrews / Debbie Castiller2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Collins / Jocelyn Quick vs Aulia Tandradinata / Jennifer Waychoff4-6, 4-6
2025-08-24vs MD.GucciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jabusch / Robyn Merck vs Angie Bostrom / Brigette Flower1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTara Navarro / Jocelyn Quick vs Becky King / Stephanie Wright3-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs BENT.WagnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobyn Merck / Carol Collins vs Jenna Wood / Molly Schneider3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Sarah Hall vs Rachel Sanders / RANEE KUMAR6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-10vs CAS.ShafferLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Hall / Robyn Merck vs Lisa Griffin / Megan Kimsey1-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs TOC.KargWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Lisa Carley vs Carolina Robayo / Sharon Fred6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Madeline Cambo
published
3.07
Lisa Carley
published
3.04
Christina Scagnelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
published
2.90
Jocelyn Quick
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.83
Robyn Merck
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.80
Sarah Forman
published
2.79
Carol Collins
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Merck + Christina Scagnelli4160% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Merck + Carol Collins123 matchesnot enough data
Christina Scagnelli + Jocelyn Quick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madeline Cambo
28W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Lisa Carley
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3
Christina Scagnelli
110W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Stephanie Jabusch
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Jocelyn Quick
60W–72L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Robyn Merck
91W–131L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Sarah Forman
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Carol Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.