Teams

Wise Aces

2022 Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over Spring · Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-21vs ICYCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarla Aste vs Ruth Simpson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Ann Dean vs Pamela Grady / Beth Kendrick6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Denue / Cindy Mathys vs Cynthia Goforth / Lana King7-5, 6-2
2022-07-12Won 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Mathys / Dawn Neel vs Betsy Barkley / Elizabeth Maddux6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Margaret Denue vs Debbie Gillispie / Terrie Dort6-4, 6-1
2022-07-09vs 40-LoveLost 02
L#1 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Ariel Selwyn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Elizabeth Hazard vs Shaun Sullivan / Katie Leimbach1-6, 0-6
2022-06-25vs 40-LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarla Aste / Dawn Neel vs Lorrie Roberts / Virgen Caunedo6-2, 6-4
2022-06-18vs 40-LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Brita Robinson vs Shaun Sullivan / Katie Leimbach6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hazard / Dorota Sipko vs Virgen Caunedo / Ariel Selwyn4-6, 2-6
2022-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Denue / Meg Bohmke vs Linda Fothe / Brenda Christoforatos6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Pamela Ryon vs Linda Fothe / Ruth Simpson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Brita Robinson
published 4.5
3.83
Widna Benitez
published
3.82
Meg Bohmke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Amy French
published 4
3.69
Cindy Mathys
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Marla Aste
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Susan Thompson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brita Robinson
44W–35L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Widna Benitez
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Meg Bohmke
26W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Amy French
6W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cindy Mathys
98W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Marla Aste
83W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Susan Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.