Teams

FK Ms. Hits - Centonze

2025 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-16vs Villages SchappellLost 01
L#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Caroline Murray vs Kimberly Buffington / Mime Ichini-Lurie3-6, 0-6
2025-03-02vs FK WalshWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebby Watts / Beth Riendeau vs Diane Stablein / Susan Garrick6-0, 6-2
2025-02-23vs SKY SpinaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Judy Hoops vs Ellen Barnes / Debra Malone2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCaroline Murray / Eileen Lombardo vs Suzanne Busk / Linda Lademann6-3, 6-0
2025-02-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebby Watts / Nancy Little vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-14vs FK London -BarletWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Diana Royo vs Beatrice Barlet / Jami Nordenstam6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-09vs Villages SchappellLost 01
L#3 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Leigh Chak vs Patty Swanson / Nancy Rushman3-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs FK WalshLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeigh Chak / Judy Hoops vs Jill Kimball / Marianne Marcoux5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-18vs SKY SpinaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCaroline Murray / Eileen Lombardo vs Suzanne Busk / Linda Lademann7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Debby Watts vs Rayetta Spina / Nancy Fetzer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
published 5
3.96
Diana Royo
published 4
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Debby Watts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.76
Beth Riendeau
published 4
3.45
Dina Sapienza
published
3.41
Judy Hoops
published
Leigh Chak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Little
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Rhonda Sangster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Chak + Debby Watts5060% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Eileen Lombardo134 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Beth Riendeau
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.