Teams

CSRC EVANS

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs LTFCS WAGNERLost 13
L#1 DoublesEvan Evans / Steven Rubin vs Regan Arntzen / Thomas Hutson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Jeffrey Bornemann3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesArturo Serrano / Ron Bruns vs John Wei / Kyle Charles6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Riley / David Phelps vs Auston Tighe / Curtis Lillybridge1-6, 2-6
2026-05-20vs CSCC PEPPERLost 14
L#1 DoublesRon Bruns / Chris Johnson vs Amadee Pepper / Gary Hanson4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Darryl Deighton0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Riley / Steven Rubin vs Jordan Gateley / Keith Oppenheim1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesArturo Serrano vs Thomas Holton6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Phelps / Evan Evans vs Mike Laduke / Freddie Provenzano5-7, 3-6
2026-05-13vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 32
W#1 DoublesChris Johnson / Tom Brokaw vs Iain Anderson / Jackson Duncan6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesArturo Serrano vs Judson Stern3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Hedges / Evan Evans vs Jeffrey Leach / Ryan Dekker2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSteven Rubin vs Jesus Hylan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Riley / David Phelps vs Jeff Thomas / John Decelles6-4, 6-3
2026-05-11vs FHCS SCUTELLAROWon 32
W#1 DoublesTom Brokaw / Chris Johnson vs Joseph Auther / Richard Scutellaro7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesArturo Serrano vs Jay White6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEvan Evans / Ron Bruns vs Josh Ward / Gary Gelston2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Daniel Gibbons4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Phelps / Richard Riley vs Daniel Henley / Derek Malmgren6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-29vs PBCP MORRISSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTom Brokaw / Steven Rubin vs Andrew Nunn / Joseph Joshua2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Benjamin Morris2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Johnson / Ron Bruns vs Josh Chambers / Brian Justice5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvan Evans / Richard Riley vs Jessie Garcia / Eric Copeland7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-22vs LTFCS WAGNERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChris Johnson / Evan Evans vs Angelito Sarmiento / Regan Arntzen2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesArturo Serrano vs Kyle Charles6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTom Brokaw / Ron Bruns vs Gregory Tabor / Thomas Hutson4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Curtis Lillybridge6-1, 6-4
2026-04-15vs CSCC PEPPERLost 05
L#1 DoublesChris Johnson / Tom Brokaw vs Amadee Pepper / Gregg Hall7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Hedges vs Darryl Deighton0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Rubin / Ron Bruns vs Troy Limmer / Gary Hanson4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesArturo Serrano vs Aaron Stoller4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Riley / David Phelps vs Jordan Gateley / Tim Nagle3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Chris Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.02
Steven Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Arturo Serrano
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Ron Bruns
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.61
Robert Hedges
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.49
Tom Brokaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Evan Evans
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Richard Riley
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.24
David Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Riley + Evan Evans1439% games+0.5% vs expected
Ron Bruns + Chris Johnson2351% games−0.0% vs expected
Tom Brokaw + Chris Johnson3451% games−1.0% vs expected
Evan Evans + Tom Brokaw1433% games−3.5% vs expected
Tom Brokaw + Steven Rubin1530% games−15.6% vs expected
Richard Riley + David Phelps224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Riley + Ron Bruns123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Riley + Steven Rubin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Johnson
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Steven Rubin
9W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Arturo Serrano
13W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Ron Bruns
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Robert Hedges
10W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
Tom Brokaw
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Evan Evans
3W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Richard Riley
8W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
David Phelps
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.