Teams

MMcCullough-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Ephesus Park Tennis Courts
Oct 8 8:00 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
2026-09-01vs EPatulski-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Courtney Van Houtven vs Khelsey Lemon / Hannah Gahagan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Johnston / Amanda Klein vs Areli Grodski / Susanne Schmal2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAbi Raja / Athena Samaras vs Rachel Latson / Ni Zhang6-0, 6-2
2026-08-23vs EPatulski-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan McCullough / Amanda Laird vs Katie Helms / Areli Grodski4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Van Houtven / Virginia Wang vs Sophia Ewing / Hannah Gahagan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Johnston / Athena Samaras vs Khelsey Lemon / Lauren Kane4-6, 4-6
2026-08-13vs ABoone-TOCHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Laird / Susan Kim vs Meredith Bazemore / Dana Crotts1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMegan McCullough / Athena Samaras vs Holly Baker / Angela Boone6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Megan McCullough
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Abi Raja
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Annaliese Gresham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Amanda Laird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Courtney Van Houtven
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Virginia Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Athena Samaras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Amanda Klein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Leslie Unroe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Laird + Megan McCullough123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan McCullough
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.88
2.5
Abi Raja
9W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Annaliese Gresham
68W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Amanda Laird
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Courtney Van Houtven
3W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Virginia Wang
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Athena Samaras
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Amanda Klein
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Leslie Unroe
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.