Teams

Pecot/70/3.5/M/LA

70 & Over Adult Multi State Invitational - MEN · 3.5 (70&O) MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs Middleton/70/3.5/M/TXWon 21
W#1 DoublesRushing Green / Craig Lott vs Michael Engle / Jim Middleton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Namie / Jack Pecot vs John Peterson / Michael Simpson6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesStan Elmore / Benny Fernandez vs Kurt Massing / Bobby Howard4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Alexander/70/3.5/M/LAWon 21
L#1 DoublesBenny Fernandez / Stan Elmore vs Eddie Holman / Randy Cooper2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRushing Green / Craig Lott vs Mark Kalbacher / Randall Brown6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRick Namie / Jack Pecot vs Joe Simpson / Anthony Spano6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs Hvostik/70/3.5/M/TXLost 12
L#1 DoublesStan Elmore / Benny Fernandez vs Phil Kerig / Stan Schmid3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBill Jackson / Rick Namie vs Calvin Mein / John Gomez6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRushing Green / Craig Lott vs Marval Bailiff / Stan Hvostik6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-20vs WILSON/70/3.5/M/MSLost 03
L#1 DoublesRushing Green / Craig Lott vs Dan Bokros / Joey Stroble1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBenny Fernandez / Jack Pecot vs David Stanovich / John Wilkinson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBill Jackson / Rick Namie vs David Farris / Jimmy Johnson6-1, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 (70&O) MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Bill Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Jack Pecot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Craig Lott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Benny Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Rick Namie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Rushing Green
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Stan Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Lott + Rushing Green4150% games−4.9% vs expected
Stan Elmore + Benny Fernandez0639% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Jackson
88W–48L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jack Pecot
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Craig Lott
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Benny Fernandez
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Rick Namie
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rushing Green
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Stan Elmore
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.