Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Mequon Elite Buell

2022 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women (Eve)

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKamal Irani / Linda Match vs Karen Straw / Dagmar Vetta6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Buri / Katherine Critz vs Patricia Hanz / Peggy Pomplin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Levin / Sandy Schumaker vs Christine Laemmar'Faber / Paula Bergquist3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Match / Katherine Critz vs Glenna Haas / Nada Uzelac6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSharon Buell / Amy Diorio vs Nora Pecor / Lauren Silbar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Walz / Christine Frank vs Eileen Paykel / Ada Vogel3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Stromsted / Katie Knudsen vs Theresa Seem / Jennifer Garven3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Frank / Candace Walz vs Charlotte Freeman / Julie Dunn7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Buell / Amy Diorio vs Lori Falk / Marina Melberg1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKamal Irani / Linda Match vs Bernett Crymes / Joan Donner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarrie Buri / Katherine Critz vs Deborah Hogate / Lanette Kagen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Buell / Jenny Levin vs Kathie Chvojicek / Kim Temkin-Taylor3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKatie Knudsen / Karen Stromsted vs Theresa Leopold / Joyce Koker6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Buell / Amy Diorio vs Asiyah Khan / Cheryl May2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Levin / Sandy Schumaker vs Jenny Anderson / Michelle Waller0-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesChristine Frank / Candace Walz vs Nancy Huttelmaier / Melanie Kuzmanovic3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandy Schumaker / Karen Stromsted vs Sadie Podewils / Valery Koch3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Buell / Katherine Critz vs PATRICIA EICHTEN / Pamela Cavanaugh4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Match / Kamal Irani vs Christine Laemmar'Faber / Robin Devilbiss6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Stromsted / Katie Knudsen vs Patricia Hanz / Peggy Pomplin6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCandace Walz / Christine Frank vs Paula Bergquist / Julie Reigle6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLinda Match / Kamal Irani vs Lina Cicero / Linda Koenig6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatherine Critz / Candace Walz vs Glenna Haas / Eileen Paykel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Knudsen / Sandy Schumaker vs Paula Shows / Amy Richmond6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women (Eve)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML River Glen Melberg8119824224
2WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Princeton Eichten6318921230
3WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Lifesport Rutchik6318923216
4WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Mequon Elite Buell44101431238
5WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML The Legend Murn3581633238
6WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Highlander Courtney36111634242
7WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Mequon Elite Pecor36121535266
8WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Elite North Shore Kagen2791840275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Karen Stromsted
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Candace Walz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Christine Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Sharon Buell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Carrie Buri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Diorio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jenny Levin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kamal Irani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Critz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Katie Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Match
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Schumaker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Match + Kamal Irani11169% games+9.2% vs expected
Linda Match + Karen Stromsted8166% games+6.0% vs expected
Sandy Schumaker + Sharon Buell2843% games−1.7% vs expected
Katherine Critz + Carrie Buri4446% games−3.8% vs expected
Amy Diorio + Sharon Buell51037% games−5.8% vs expected
Karen Stromsted + Katie Knudsen3351% games−7.4% vs expected
Sandy Schumaker + Katie Knudsen2539% games−11.7% vs expected
Carrie Buri + Karen Stromsted1736% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Stromsted
63W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Candace Walz
45W–91L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Christine Frank
73W–159L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sharon Buell
58W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Carrie Buri
34W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Amy Diorio
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenny Levin
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kamal Irani
58W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Critz
8W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Knudsen
21W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Match
75W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Schumaker
8W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.