Teams

Grindstaff/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs MacOn/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesDawn Duke / Parker Casler vs Gwynne MacOn / Stacy McIntosh3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJanet Jungclaus vs Jamie Hughes5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Ashley Tipton vs Megan Campbell / Sarah Palmquist0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEmma Poindexter vs Arielle Kilday6-0, 6-4
2025-04-26vs MacOn/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmma Poindexter / Hailey Motter vs LISA PETTY / Ellen Ritchey6-3, 6-2
2025-04-19vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesDawn Duke / Allison Oaks vs Jennifer Cook / Brooke Thurman1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJoy Bray vs Melissa Fuesting0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Jennifer Mendoza vs Janet Morgan / Meg Brown1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEmma Poindexter vs Katharine Brosnan6-4, 6-1
2025-04-05vs MacOn/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Oaks / Dawn Duke vs Gwynne MacOn / Arielle Kilday4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJoy Bray vs Jamie Hughes0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHilary Brooks vs LISA PETTY4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-29vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesParker Casler / Hailey Motter vs Brooke Govert / Heather McKeehan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmma Poindexter vs Melissa Fuesting4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Jennifer Mendoza vs Ashli Christen / Jen Rose1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJanet Jungclaus vs Geri Landry4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Oaks / Hilary Brooks vs Annabel Sims / Katharine Brosnan4-6, 1-6
2025-03-08vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Warden / Emma Poindexter vs Cassidy Hawkins / Sarah Olesiuk2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCheri Arnsdorff vs Melissa Fuesting1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Grindstaff / Joy Bray vs Ruthie Ivy / Emily Miner2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Mendoza vs Katharine Brosnan7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Ashley Tipton vs Jennifer Cook / Geri Landry2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Hailey Motter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Hilary Brooks
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Parker Casler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.43
Ashley Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.39
Dawn Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Chelsea Grindstaff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Allison Oaks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Savannah Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Emma Poindexter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Janet Jungclaus
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Joy Bray
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Warden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Arnsdorff + Jennifer Mendoza8271% games+16.2% vs expected
Hilary Brooks + Ashley Tipton3351% games+0.1% vs expected
Ashley Tipton + Savannah Johnson134 matchesnot enough data
Cheri Arnsdorff + Savannah Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Brooks + Jennifer Mendoza303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Jennifer Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hailey Motter
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Hilary Brooks
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Parker Casler
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Ashley Tipton
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Dawn Duke
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
3
Chelsea Grindstaff
1W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Allison Oaks
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Savannah Johnson
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Emma Poindexter
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Jungclaus
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Bray
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Warden
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.