Teams

E.Cutts/A.Adams

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs P.HankersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Ashley McRae / Mary Marshall Easley6-2, 7-5
2023-05-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Amy Redmond / Bailey Wilson7-6, 6-3
2023-05-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Ashley Warren / Carleigh Moore6-0, 6-2
2023-04-29vs L.MarguliesWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Cara Kuremsky / Celia Whited6-2, 6-0
2023-04-23vs N.NaramorWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Abigail Holden / Aulia Tandradinata6-1, 7-5
2023-04-15vs C.Conzola 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesTiffany Barrier vs Angelica Rose6-4, 7-6
2023-04-07vs S.SZIKSAIWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Lindsey Klein vs Karen Reynders / Rebecca Reynolds6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-11vs A.Lyon 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsey Klein / Tiffany Barrier vs April Lyon / Debra Vaughn6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Skylar Poole
published
3.72
Tiffany Barrier
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Lindsey Klein
published
3.57
Jackie Caprio
published
3.56
Emily Cutts
published
3.49
Amanda Lindsay
published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Newton
published
3.13
Mary-Peyton Amburn
published
2.98
Ingrid Holscher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Lindsay + Skylar Poole303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skylar Poole
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Tiffany Barrier
145W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lindsey Klein
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Jackie Caprio
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Emily Cutts
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Amanda Lindsay
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Elizabeth Newton
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Mary-Peyton Amburn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Ingrid Holscher
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.