Teams

V - Moranda Park I'd Hit That

2021 USTA Mixed 18 &Over · Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-08vs V - Sunset Hit n RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeressa Garland / Henry Schmoker vs Susan Consoletti / Mitch Pruett3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Napoli / Henry Schmoker vs Scott Sutorius / Bahar Sutorius6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-11vs V - Las Posas Dream TeamWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Cotsis / Lauren Napoli vs Dai Cabaret / Spencer Kettle6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Garland / Keressa Garland vs Chris Salcido / Jean Salcido6-1, 6-2
2021-06-27vs V - WAC Mixed UpWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Henry Schmoker vs Kathleen Schatz / Cenk Undey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKeressa Garland / Danny Everett vs Steven Bleier / Leslie Silverman6-3, 7-5
2021-06-20vs V - Wood Ranch Thorns N'RosesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeressa Garland / Michael Garland vs Lisa Trombley / Jonathan Trombley4-6, 1-6
2021-06-12vs V - Spanish Hills SwingersLost 02
L#1 DoublesHenry Schmoker / Lauren Napoli vs Edwin Ramirez / Rachel Ramirez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Garland / Keressa Garland vs Brian Colon / Dana Lavenant6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nathalie Smith
published
3.56
Danny Everett
published 3.5
3.51
Lauren Napoli
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Michael Garland
published
3.29
Marc Roaquin
published
3.17
Matthew Maxel
published
3.11
Wendy Brown
published
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.07
John Cotsis
published
Linda Hewitt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathalie Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Danny Everett
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Lauren Napoli
144W–52L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Michael Garland
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Marc Roaquin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Matthew Maxel
8W–20L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%27%73%
3.08
John Cotsis
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Hewitt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.