Teams

Reiss, Beth

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-15vs Mangum, EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMandy Johnson / Cindy Tapscott vs Kelli Ford / Kaytlin Benzel0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Reiss vs Mary Lauren Boykin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChandry Brown / Natella Boulton vs Emily Mangum / Merry Farris0-6, 1-6
2026-04-08vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Reiss / Cindy Tapscott vs Kim Maureen Price / Chrystal Gray0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBridgett Perez vs Stephanie Jierski4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Bentley / Mandy Johnson vs Elaine Manuel / Camille Horton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-01vs Renfrow, MeredithLost 02
L#1 DoublesGracie King / Amy Parkes vs Jordan Bryan / Tracy Rhinewalt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Johnson / Julia Yermolovich vs Britini Breazeale / Meredith Renfrow7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-25vs Williams, CindyWon 21
L#1 DoublesGracie King / Bridgett Perez vs Allison Wallace / Emilie Lynn6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Parkes vs Danette Tannehill6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMandy Johnson / Julia Yermolovich vs Jamie Mask / Allison Sims7-5, 6-1
2026-03-18vs Aikens, AdrienneWon 21
L#1 DoublesBridgett Perez / Julia Yermolovich vs Haley Lowe / Adrienne Aikens3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Parkes vs Kayli Rutland6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGracie King / Natella Boulton vs Tina Wells / Corinne Dickens6-3, 6-1
2026-03-04vs Mangum, EmilyLost 12
W#1 DoublesGracie King / Amy Parkes vs Emily Mangum / Mary Parker Plunkett2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaty Bentley vs Mary Lauren Boykin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Yermolovich / Beth Reiss vs Meredith Delaune / Kristi Thompson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-25vs Manuel, ElaineLost 03
L#1 DoublesBridgett Perez / Julia Yermolovich vs Candice Ross / Chrystal Gray3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChandry Brown vs Stephanie Jierski0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Reiss / Katy Bentley vs Elaine Manuel / Kim Maureen Price3-6, 3-6
2026-02-18vs Renfrow, MeredithWon 21
L#1 DoublesGracie King / Katy Bentley vs Meredith Renfrow / Mackenzie Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Parkes vs Tracy Rhinewalt6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulia Yermolovich / Bridgett Perez vs Paige Porter / Sarah Allen6-4, 6-3
2026-02-11vs Williams, CindyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBridgett Perez / Beth Reiss vs Allison Wallace / Anna Lucovich0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGracie King vs Jill Miller7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCindy Tapscott / Amy Parkes vs Emilie Lynn / Lydia Walters4-6, 6-7
2026-02-04vs Aikens, AdrienneLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Parkes / Gracie King vs Lisa Gemar / Romy Abboud6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNatella Boulton vs Haley Lowe6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Reiss / Mandy Johnson vs Sandy Dickens / Corinne Dickens5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Gracie King
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.35
Natella Boulton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Julia Yermolovich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Amy Parkes
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.12
Katy Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.02
Beth Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.93
Cindy Tapscott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Bridgett Perez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
1.73
Chandry Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Parkes + Gracie King224 matchesnot enough data
Julia Yermolovich + Bridgett Perez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gracie King
5W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Natella Boulton
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Julia Yermolovich
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Amy Parkes
5W–3L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Katy Bentley
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Beth Reiss
0W–12L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Cindy Tapscott
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
2.5
Bridgett Perez
1W–6L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Chandry Brown
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.