Teams

CV-LLW-Shadow Mountain/Houseman & Ives

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Men 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-04vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Tamaki & WyosnickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBruno Jaeger / Kerry Bucklin vs Paul Wulf / Leonard Wofford5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Freeman / Marty Briesach vs Donald Rintoul / Dann Kepford6-1, 6-3
2024-02-12vs CV-Shadow Mountain/Tamaki & WyosnickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKerry Bucklin / Bruno Jaeger vs Leonard Wofford / Paul Wulf6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Freeman / Ernest Russell Ives vs Mike Tamaki / Donald Rintoul6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Tony Martin vs Kim Jow / Craig Wyosnick6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEric Freeman / Ernest Russell Ives vs Kim Jow / Donald Rintoul6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesErnest Russell Ives / Eric Freeman vs Donald Rintoul / Mike Tamaki6-0, 6-3
2024-01-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Wlcek / Tony Martin vs Don Eriksson / Craig Wyosnick4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kerry Bucklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
John Wlcek
published
4.31
Eric Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Bruno Jaeger
published 4.5
3.94
Gerald Mehciz
published
3.86
Stephen Arnstein
published
3.78
Tony Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeff Jara
published
Marty Briesach
published
Matt Houseman
published
Michael Bailin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Houseman + Tony Martin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kerry Bucklin
42W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
4.36
John Wlcek
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Eric Freeman
68W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Bruno Jaeger
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Gerald Mehciz
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Stephen Arnstein
24W–24L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Tony Martin
53W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Jeff Jara
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marty Briesach
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Houseman
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Bailin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.