Teams

Marco YMCA - Nelz

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-12-14vs Pelican Bay Park - perrinoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNeli Nelz / Pattie Yergler vs Sandy Perrino / Behnoosh Behmaram6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Paula Crane vs Kelly Smith / Constance Byrne6-4, 7-6
2020-12-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Jones / Betsy Conte vs Mary Horn / Stacey Schwind6-1, 7-5
2020-12-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesNeli Nelz / Pattie Yergler vs Carolyn Burke / Andrea Sheidy7-5, 6-2
2020-11-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Teri Ryan6-1, 6-1
2020-11-21vs Vineyards - JoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNeli Nelz / Pattie Yergler vs Renee DiGangi / Melanie Howe7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2020-11-02vs AceKickers - Isles of Collier - OddySplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Dawn Jones vs Dawn Cooper / Gail Gattas6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Rafferty / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Maria Oddy / Deborah Doppelt6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Dawn Jones vs Kate Keillor / Cheryl Copps2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-10-12vs Vineyards - JoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Rose / Pattie Yergler vs Melanie Howe / Renee DiGangi3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Ana Cecilia Isaza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
Betsy Conte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Laura Hansmann
published
2.59
Susan Rafferty
published
2.44
Neli Nelz
published
Melanie Rose
published
Paula Crane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hansmann + Susan Rafferty3354% games+2.7% vs expected
Pattie Yergler + Ana Cecilia Isaza16263% gamesnot enough data
Pattie Yergler + Betsy Conte6654% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Conte + Ana Cecilia Isaza303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Cecilia Isaza
200W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
2.61
Susan Rafferty
5W–16L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Neli Nelz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melanie Rose
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.