Teams

CCV-Rahal

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-18vs MAC-LoosWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Rahal / Byron Holmes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPhilip King / Beth Robbins vs Daniela Otto / John DiNardi6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-12vs SAL-BaderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Byron Holmes vs Nina Sorkin - (DQ) / Geoff Usher2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMindy Angel / John Reifsnider vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-03vs HERM-FisherLost 02
L#2 DoublesBeth Robbins / William Krusen vs Aynsley Fisher / Evan Bernstine6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMindy Angel / Christopher Blair vs Mac Stuckey / Susan Hanson1-6, 2-6
2023-02-26vs WW-HenryWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Krusen / Beth Robbins vs Becky Oatts / Todd Prince6-3, 6-4
2023-02-17vs Salisbury-RiehmLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Blair / Beth Robbins vs Beth Gardner / James Lawrence2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Krusen / Andrea Rahal vs J Lafors / Maren Riehm6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-02-11vs ACAC-ChandlerLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Rahal / Wesley Atiyeh vs Diego Marti Vertiz / Jeanine Wisor1-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs BURK-ButterworthLost 01
L#3 DoublesByron Holmes / Andrea Rahal vs Skyler Stone / Logan Stone5-7, 2-6
2023-01-22vs MAC-WilliamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Rahal / Greg Williams vs Delaney Rhodus / Ryan Berry5-7, 6-7
2023-01-15vs RAIN-SinsabaughLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Williams / Beth Robbins vs David Dwight / Margie Ray5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Blair
published 4.5
4.23
Byron Holmes
published 4.5
4.19
William Krusen
published
4.16
Beth Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Katherine Mueller
published
4.12
Philip King
published
3.92
Mindy Angel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Andrea Rahal
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.65
John Reifsnider
published
Genevieve Alley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Blair
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Byron Holmes
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
William Krusen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Beth Robbins
48W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
Katherine Mueller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
Philip King
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Mindy Angel
54W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
4.5
Andrea Rahal
55W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.91
John Reifsnider
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Genevieve Alley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.