Teams

LA-LLW-Slay All Day 40+-April Hartstein

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.59 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-07vs LA - HitWomenWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Berman / Karen Hankinson vs Jewel Kracoff / Susan Miller6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmi Belcher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDarcy Simon / Joanne Price vs Carrie Kisker / Lisa Novajosky5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristina Chen / Jennie Speciale vs Eriko Shigenaga / Mary Soto5-7, 2-6
2024-04-02vs LA - HitWomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmi Belcher / Amy Thompson vs Mary Soto / Susan Miller6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDarcy Simon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Berman / Karen Hankinson vs Jewel Kracoff / Maria de Carvalho3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-23vs LA - Team AllisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSerena Davis / Christina Catipay vs Jill Bauman / Krista Bissell6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Juliani / Carolyn Atchison vs Kelly Moss / Satsuki Yamashita6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoanne Price / Ami Belcher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-18vs LA - Team AllisonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLoretta Peng / Gloria Geller vs Jana Conley / Amy Hampton6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYuri Nichelson / Kristina Chen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-17vs LA - Team AllisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarcy Simon / Carolyn Atchison vs JANE CHUN / Tiffany Lee6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Park / Christina Catipay vs Amy Hampton / Celia Dominguez6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Chen / Kristina Chen vs Jana Conley / Erica Perkins6-1, 6-0
2024-02-10vs LA - HitWomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesApril Hartstein / Carolyn Atchison vs Julie Blackwell / Phyllis Crotty6-2, 6-1
2024-02-03vs LA - HitWomenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Berman / Gloria Geller vs Joanna Morley / Samantha Kadera6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Atchison / Julie Juliani vs Maria de Carvalho / Lisa Novajosky6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesApril Hartstein / Linda Park vs Mary Soto / Susan Miller6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Carolyn Atchison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.61
Joanne Price
published
4.49
Darcy Simon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.48
Yuri Nichelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Karen Hankinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Kristina Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
April Hartstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Christine Chen
published 4.5
4.15
Gloria Geller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Jennie Speciale
published
4.03
Alison Harma
published 4.5
3.94
Ami Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Kelly Ford
published
Julie Juliani
published
Linda Park
published
Loretta Peng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Atchison + Darcy Simon9559% games+10.6% vs expected
April Hartstein + Carolyn Atchison8556% games+8.9% vs expected
Karen Hankinson + Darcy Simon10655% games+0.5% vs expected
Kristina Chen + Christine Chen11558% games−5.0% vs expected
Ami Belcher + April Hartstein9752% gamesnot enough data
Christina Catipay + Kristina Chen4263% gamesnot enough data
April Hartstein + Yuri Nichelson4263% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hankinson + Yuri Nichelson4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carolyn Atchison
64W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.62
Joanne Price
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.61
5
Darcy Simon
96W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
206W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Kristina Chen
152W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
4.33
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Christine Chen
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Alison Harma
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Ami Belcher
60W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Kelly Ford
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.86
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Park
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Loretta Peng
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.