Teams

JDichak (WSRC)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-08-05vs WLewis (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesBrett Harrell vs Gregory Vlahos6-3, 6-1
2024-08-01vs MTwer (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesFrank Grindle vs Daniel Kolepp6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-25Won 10
W#3 SinglesBrett Harrell vs Ziyou Wu6-1, 7-6
2024-07-23vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#3 SinglesBrett Harrell vs Singh B Dhillon7-5, 6-3
2024-06-27Won 10
W#3 SinglesBrett Harrell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-20vs RZamudio (Col Beatty)Won 10
W#2 SinglesFrank Grindle vs Ross Berger6-0, 6-0
2024-06-18vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Kevin Baker0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRon Dock vs Rakesh Kumar Vojjini1-6, 2-1
2024-06-13vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesFrank Grindle vs ROB SAPPENFIELD6-7, 2-6
2024-05-30vs GEstrada (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Jared Mitchell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFrank Grindle vs Ivan Blakeney2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRon Dock vs Scott Hamer3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Brett Harrell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Frank Grindle
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Lawler
published 3.5
3.27
Eric O'Brien
published
3.15
Ron Dock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Alberto Botero
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Grindle + Joseph Dichak8850% games−4.0% vs expected
Joseph Dichak + Ron Dock8158% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Lawler + Eric O'Brien303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Harrell
74W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Frank Grindle
99W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Andrew Lawler
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Eric O'Brien
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ron Dock
85W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Alberto Botero
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.