Teams

V - LLN-RanchoMaderaVintageVamps-LisaBrady

2021 USTA Adult 55 &Over · Ventura - Women 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-11vs V - Royal Aces 55Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Tracee Nilsson vs Barb Jepson / Geraldine Farrell6-0, 6-1
2021-06-27vs V - North Ranch FlashersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharon Erickson / Madeleine Lindvall vs Liat Ciardi / Tammy Snyder7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie Gisler / Tracee Nilsson vs Lori Byer / Silvia Benun7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2021-06-19vs V - Royal Aces 55Won 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Brady / Madeleine Lindvall vs Stella Dumlao-Idea / Renee Kieselbach6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Gisler / Tracee Nilsson vs Beth Bloomfield / Maryam Rassouli6-4, 6-0
2021-05-30vs V - Sherwood StarsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadeleine Lindvall / Sharon Erickson vs Connie Mundell / Teresa Zobrist6-1, 6-2
2021-05-22vs V - North Ranch FlashersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Scanlon / Madeleine Lindvall vs Donna Leidersdorf / Susan Friedman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Erickson / Julie Gisler vs Liat Ciardi / Beth Benton4-6, 4-6
2021-05-01vs V - Sherwood StarsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaureen Scanlon / Madeleine Lindvall vs Leslie Matthews / Donna Oshatz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Brady / Julie Gisler vs Connie Mundell / Carrie Nebens6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nathalie Smith
published
3.61
Madeleine Lindvall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Tracee Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Lisa Brady
published
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
published 3.5
3.20
Julie Gisler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Linda Hewitt
published
Sharon Erickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Gisler + Tracee Nilsson4457% gamesnot enough data
Madeleine Lindvall + Tracee Nilsson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathalie Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Madeleine Lindvall
118W–141L career · 9 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Lisa Brady
18W–43L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Julie Gisler
124W–126L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Linda Hewitt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Erickson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.