Teams

Selma - Barrette

2025 Selma Adult 40 & Over · Women's 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Ingrid Gamboa
published 3.5
3.21
Katie Barrette
published
3.14
Jennifer Dobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Tara Hardin
published
2.88
Melinda Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dana Bohannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kim Pierson
published
Nikki Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ingrid Gamboa
24W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Katie Barrette
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Jennifer Dobbs
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Tara Hardin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Melinda Fuller
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Dana Bohannon
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Pierson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Gilmore
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.