Teams

SFV Paseo United

2022 Adult 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs SFV BBB - Braemar Big BallersWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrank Abt / Philip Smith vs Keith Small / John Rubeli6-2, 6-1
2022-06-12vs SFV Nikki’s Tennis CrewWon 10
W#2 DoublesFrank Abt / Oscar Campos vs George Garcia / Nadav Markel6-1, 6-3
2022-05-22vs SFV LLW - Acers - Lee TsaiLost 01
L#1 DoublesMikhail Zeltser / Stuart Hofmann vs Lee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-21vs SFV Ball BreakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesOscar Campos / Mikhail Zeltser vs Deepak Antony / Dennis Alfelor6-3, 6-2
2022-04-30vs SFV 40-LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesFrank Abt / Pramit Singh vs Richard Verrier / Steven Hanson6-2, 6-4
2022-04-10vs SFV Burbank Breaking BadLost 01
L#2 DoublesMikhail Zeltser / Philip Smith vs Paul Ketrick / Jisoo Han3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Chris Erickson
published 4
3.76
Juan Solano
published
3.64
Frank Abt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Gil Garteiz
published 3.5
3.46
Mikhail Zeltser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Pramit Singh
published
3.41
Stuart Hofmann
published
James George
published 3.5
3.23
Oscar Campos
published
3.10
Gregory Straub
published 3.5
Mrinmoy Das
published
Peter Felsch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Abt + Mikhail Zeltser11355% gamesnot enough data
Mikhail Zeltser + Pramit Singh314 matchesnot enough data
Gil Garteiz + Pramit Singh303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Erickson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
Juan Solano
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Frank Abt
114W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Gil Garteiz
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Mikhail Zeltser
107W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Pramit Singh
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Stuart Hofmann
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
James George
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Oscar Campos
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gregory Straub
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mrinmoy Das
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Felsch
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.