Teams

credit

Adult 18 & Over Early Start · Credit -

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Credit -
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1credit000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Julian Mirano
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.98
Kristina Burdine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Marnie Binney
published
Anja McLouth
published 3
2.74
Nita Jain
published
Kayla Henderson
published
Kimberly Dangremond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kitsie Johnson
published
Suparavee Edmunds
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julian Mirano
63W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Kristina Burdine
55W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Marnie Binney
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Anja McLouth
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nita Jain
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Kayla Henderson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Dangremond
42W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kitsie Johnson
54W–64L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suparavee Edmunds
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.