Teams

Ka.Manooch18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-03vs Da.Berry18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesDina Berling / Anna Brown vs Dawn Berry / KC Griffin4-3
L#2 DoublesCallie Hurst / Kara Manooch vs Lauren Kilpatrick / Ann Flores2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMallory Houchin / Alana Goldstein vs Lauren Thortsen / Terry Marcott5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-12vs Da.Boone18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Brown / Alicia Gilleskie vs Amanda Mullen / Jessica Vickers5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCallie Hurst / Stephanie Styers vs Jessy Ellis / Claire See6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDina Berling / Mallory Houchin vs Nina Thomas / Sarah Seward6-2, 6-1
2025-08-28vs Da.Boone18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesArielle Dozier / Alicia Gilleskie vs Jessy Ellis / Devany Ayers3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Brown / Stephanie Styers vs Helena Rumsey / Megan Wilkinson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Johnson / Dina Berling vs Jessica Vickers / Diane Pokorney4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Stephanie Styers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Drewry Carter
published 2.5
2.49
Callie Hurst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.49
Mallory Houchin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Dina Berling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.07
Alicia Gilleskie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Arielle Dozier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.92
Alana Goldstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.86
Kara Manooch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Callie Hurst + Mallory Houchin224 matchesnot enough data
Drewry Carter + Callie Hurst213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Styers
28W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.60
2.5
Drewry Carter
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Callie Hurst
24W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
Mallory Houchin
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Dina Berling
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Alicia Gilleskie
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Arielle Dozier
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Alana Goldstein
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Kara Manooch
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.