Teams

Western: Drumlins - Geary

2022 18&Over Mixed · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs Price / LeuenbergerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Brandt / Heidi Howard vs Satyajit Marawar / Juliet Concilla6-1, 6-3
2022-03-20vs Price / LeuenbergerLost 01
L#2 DoublesIsaac Lartey / Renee de Nevers vs Greg May / Maiken Westergaard3-6, 3-6
2022-03-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Brandt / Alison Brzenchek vs Gerard Bosco / Deborah Rohe6-1, 7-5
2022-03-06vs Price / LeuenbergerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSteve Brandt / Heidi Howard vs Gerard Bosco / Deborah Rohe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee de Nevers / William Murray vs Greg May / Kim Waale6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-02-27vs Price / LeuenbergerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Brandt / Veronica Hotaling vs Richard Price / Nicole Christina3-6, 6-7
2022-02-06vs Price / LeuenbergerLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Ingraham / Renee de Nevers vs Eunhee Park / Richard Price7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Brandt / Veronica Hotaling vs Greg May / Mary Hagemann6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Drumlins - Geary5214715148
2Price / Leuenberger2571430215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michael Leopold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.32
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Heidi Howard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Veronica Hotaling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Alison Brzenchek
published 3.5
3.10
Kenneth Geary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Allyson Mead
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Steve Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.60
Renee de Nevers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fatma Sonmez-Leopold + Michael Leopold15660% games+8.3% vs expected
Heidi Howard + Steve Brandt10070% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Mead + Kenneth Geary5347% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Hotaling + Steve Brandt5359% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Howard + Richard Ingraham5164% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Geary + Veronica Hotaling3258% gamesnot enough data
Renee de Nevers + Steve Brandt404 matchesnot enough data
Renee de Nevers + Kenneth Geary303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Leopold
81W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
70W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Alison Brzenchek
20W–25L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Kenneth Geary
67W–81L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Allyson Mead
54W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.09
Steve Brandt
74W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Renee de Nevers
43W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.