Teams

AYTC-The IncrediBALLS! Fiebig

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Suzanne Eichenlaub
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.51
Wendy Personett
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
Results7 ties
2019-05-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Seifred / Suzanne Eichenlaub vs Genevieve Warren / Merrie Vieco6-3, 7-6
2019-05-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesWendy Personett vs Trina Cooprider4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-05-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Eichenlaub / Cora Stoakley vs Deven McCoy / Saskia Houwing7-5, 6-2
2019-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Graff / Wendy Personett vs Patricia Grant / Shelley Chapman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-04-12Split 11
W#1 SinglesWendy Personett vs Abby Harrison6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Eichenlaub vs Jessie Song6-2, 6-4
2019-03-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesWendy Personett vs Nikki Chan1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-03-22Split 11
L#2 SinglesWendy Personett vs Jill Lang6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesConstance Marley / Suzanne Eichenlaub vs Sue Cooper / Dawn Sabin6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Suzanne Eichenlaub
125W–74L career
79%22%0%
3.76
4
Wendy Personett
60W–50L career
31%69%0%
3.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.