Teams

No Love

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - POCATELLO · Mixed 5.5 - FALL MIXED

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-12vs Mixed Tape GrippersLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Gibson / Benjamin Willis vs Lynette Sayre / Ryan Sayre6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMonte Gray / Jeminee Ternus vs Emily Smith / Alin Suru1-6, 0-6
2022-09-08vs Smash CityLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeminee Ternus / Daniel Ternus vs Shawn Oram / Rachel Smith1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Pat Gates / Michele Surmelis0-6, 1-6
2022-09-07vs We Got This!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Topliff / Monte Gray vs Erin Hobbs / JARED HOBBS4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Tyler Rowland / DoniLyn Rowland4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Cameron Topliff vs Tanner Christensen / Teresa Christensen6-1, 6-3
2022-08-30vs Let's Go AgainWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonte Gray / Tiffany Topliff vs Nilsa Kohn / James Kohn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Cameron Topliff vs Brett Felt / Shaunna Kramer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Patrick Boyer / Camille Aguinaga6-3, 6-2
2022-08-24vs We Got This!Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Julie Hall / Tyler Rowland6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeminee Ternus / Daniel Ternus vs DoniLyn Rowland / Damon Rowland6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCameron Topliff / Anita Gibson vs Erin Hobbs / JARED HOBBS6-3, 6-4
2022-08-22vs Mixed Tape GrippersLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffany Topliff / Monte Gray vs Nicolle Peterson / Nathan Richardson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeminee Ternus / Daniel Ternus vs Emily Smith / Shawn Higbee2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Cameron Topliff vs Melissa Suru / Alin Suru2-6, 4-6
2022-08-12vs Smash CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesNate Stinger / Brynn Stinger vs Shawn Oram / Michele Surmelis0-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Pat Gates / Victoria Scharp2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Gibson / Cameron Topliff vs Eric Devenberg / Panayota Semons-Short6-1, 6-4
2022-08-08vs Let's Go AgainLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Cameron Topliff vs Patrick Boyer / Wendy Workman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Willis / Benjamin Willis vs Shaunna Kramer / Brett Felt6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTravis Stone / Tiffany Topliff vs James Kohn / Nilsa Kohn6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Mixed 5.5 - FALL MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smash City8020412147
2Mixed Tape Grippers6219513148
3No Love2691531226
4We Got This!2661836241
5Let's Go Again2661839257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Anita Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.94
Karlee Moeai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Daniel Ternus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Benjamin Willis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Brynn Stinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cameron Topliff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jeminee Ternus
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Willis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Monte Gray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nate Stinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Topliff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Travis Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Willis + Benjamin Willis2735% gamesnot enough data
Jeminee Ternus + Daniel Ternus1630% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Topliff + Monte Gray1538% gamesnot enough data
Karlee Moeai + Cameron Topliff314 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Topliff + Cameron Topliff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anita Gibson
146W–134L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Karlee Moeai
84W–53L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Daniel Ternus
1W–6L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Benjamin Willis
2W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Brynn Stinger
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Cameron Topliff
5W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeminee Ternus
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Willis
2W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monte Gray
1W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nate Stinger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Topliff
44W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Travis Stone
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.