Teams

STC Enslen

2025 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 8.5 Combo Women

20 players · average NTRP 4.62 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-08vs SRTC TabrahWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Berry / Shannon Brumbaugh vs Raya Tabrah / Tammy Figueroa7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Butts / Jessica Westfall vs Patricia Gilmore / Deborah Pearson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNicki Bauer / Natalie Denker vs Sally Schmidt / Kelli Melvin4-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs SRTC TabrahWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Schoenherr / Lunilia Crespo vs Kimberly McNeil / Arian McNeil6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Enslen / Pam Berry vs Sandra Mudry / Monica Sauser7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Lori West vs Carol Poe / Raya Tabrah6-3, 6-3
2021-07-11vs SRTC TabrahSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDakota Schroeder / Natalie Denker vs Mikaela Hindenlang / Monica Sauser4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Barbie Powell vs Carol Poe / Milena Alappatt6-1, 6-2
2021-05-23Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Meredith Fitch vs Deborah Pearson / Mikaela Hindenlang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Maslowski / Samantha Enslen vs Erica Echko / Bettina Magnusen6-0, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexis Covington
published 5
Amy Fritz
published 5
4.55
Dakota Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.20
Nicki Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Renuka Dewan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Samantha Enslen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Lunilia Crespo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Lori West
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.78
Kathleen Rasmussen
published
3.77
Jessica Westfall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Pam Berry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Tammy Kessler
published
3.61
Natalie Denker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.60
Sara Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.57
Deborah Benton
published 3.5
3.57
Pattie Young
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Butts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Schoenherr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Balmer
published
Shannon Brumbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Westfall + Lori West3356% games+7.1% vs expected
Jessica Westfall + Pam Berry151253% games+6.0% vs expected
Robin Balmer + Jessica Westfall4254% games+2.9% vs expected
Pattie Young + Renuka Dewan5156% games+1.8% vs expected
Tammy Kessler + Kathleen Rasmussen4939% games+0.6% vs expected
Renuka Dewan + Samantha Enslen141749% games−2.2% vs expected
Pattie Young + Jessica Westfall1542% gamesnot enough data
Robin Balmer + Samantha Enslen1449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexis Covington
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Amy Fritz
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Dakota Schroeder
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Nicki Bauer
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.20
Renuka Dewan
102W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Samantha Enslen
81W–96L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Lunilia Crespo
178W–96L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Lori West
163W–70L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Kathleen Rasmussen
65W–45L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jessica Westfall
110W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Pam Berry
63W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Tammy Kessler
158W–107L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Natalie Denker
40W–85L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Sara Robbins
131W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Deborah Benton
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Pattie Young
103W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Mary Butts
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Schoenherr
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Balmer
50W–55L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Brumbaugh
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.