Teams

ALMADEN SR CW7.5A

2021 COMBO · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Louise Peter
published
3.71
Irene Stoel
published 4
3.52
Jill Anderson
published
3.50
Julie Boncher
published
3.50
Esther Chung
published 3.5
3.45
Rini Sidartawan-Lie
published
3.43
3.30
Lisa Scala
published
3.25
Rebecca McCarthy
published
3.21
Debbie Gililland
published 3.5
3.15
Natasha Hyndman
published
3.13
Raquel Wegner
published
3.04
Naida Ergas
published
2.99
Mary Glennon
published
Mary Suchow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Christian-Neff + Jill Anderson2355% games−6.3% vs expected
Julie Boncher + Laurie Christian-Neff314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louise Peter
31W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Irene Stoel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
Jill Anderson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
Julie Boncher
31W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Esther Chung
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rini Sidartawan-Lie
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
Laurie Christian-Neff
20W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
Lisa Scala
43W–46L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
Rebecca McCarthy
21W–18L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debbie Gililland
12W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Natasha Hyndman
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Raquel Wegner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Naida Ergas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Mary Glennon
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
Mary Suchow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.