Teams

Moore 4.0 Spring 2025

2025 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Spring - HSV · 4.0 Men 18N2S3D

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-30vs HU - JohnsenLost 23
W#1 DoublesTim Snoddy / Tom Snoddy vs Nathan Johnsen / Kapil Pant3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGeorgios Priftis vs Greg Trammell0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Flanagan / Scott Gillies vs Tham Duong / Lafe Wallour3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAusten Young vs Ross Sargent1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrent Land / Michael Vanderploeg vs Tim Schlichter / Aaron Triplett3-6, 0-6
2025-03-13vs HU - JohnsenLost 05
L#1 DoublesTim Helton / Tom Snoddy vs Robert Hill / Lafe Wallour6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTim Snoddy vs John Smith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Vanderploeg / Jason Flanagan vs Kapil Pant / John Grace2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBarrett Wright vs Greg Clark4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGeorgios Priftis / Scott Gillies vs Joseph Gibson / Nathan Johnsen2-6, 3-6
2025-02-28vs HU - JohnsenLost 14
W#1 DoublesTim Helton / Tim Snoddy vs Tham Duong / John Grace7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesThomas Holt vs John Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesScott Gillies / Lance Watson vs Greg Trammell / Lafe Wallour0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Worley vs Joseph Gibson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGeorgios Priftis / Jacob Smith vs Robert Pensa / Ross Sargent3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 18N2S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Tim Snoddy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Tom Snoddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Michael Vanderploeg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Lance Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Austen Young
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Jason Flanagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Georgios Priftis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.48
Gabriel Adam Moore
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.38
Scott Gillies
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Thomas Holt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Jacob Knight
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jacob Smith
published 3.5
3.18
Barrett Wright
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.17
John Worley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.17
Brent Land
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Tim Helton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Adam Moore + Thomas Holt2350% games+0.0% vs expected
Austen Young + Lance Watson4451% games−2.9% vs expected
Brent Land + John Worley4744% games−3.4% vs expected
Gabriel Adam Moore + John Worley3441% games−6.1% vs expected
Thomas Holt + Michael Vanderploeg2446% gamesnot enough data
Brent Land + Barrett Wright0527% gamesnot enough data
Lance Watson + Scott Gillies0535% gamesnot enough data
John Worley + Scott Gillies1433% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Snoddy
27W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Tom Snoddy
63W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Michael Vanderploeg
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Lance Watson
12W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Austen Young
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jason Flanagan
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Georgios Priftis
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Gabriel Adam Moore
77W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Scott Gillies
97W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Thomas Holt
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jacob Knight
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jacob Smith
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barrett Wright
18W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
John Worley
21W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Brent Land
24W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Tim Helton
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.