Teams

Te.Paschaloudis40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-14vs Sa.Highsmith40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Neville / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Elizabeth Merritt / Ashley Gaylord4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Anna Goodmon6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Lyle / Cornelia Shaw vs Betsy Carr / Janna Myers3-6, 2-6
2026-05-07vs Ly.Clark40AWon 31
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Tina Jones vs Julie Liddle / Jacqueline Morgan3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Carolina Robayo7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Dawson / Luann Richardson vs Christine Burr / Jennifer Taylor6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCayt Kirkman / Cornelia Shaw vs Julie Karg / Elizabeth Enderline6-4, 7-6
2026-04-30vs Pa.Cochran40ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson vs Lisa Lathram / Katie Turnmire7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesGina Goldthwaite vs Jennifer Locklear0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Neville / Kelly Day vs Regina Davis / Rosemary Peters1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShelly Rogers / Amanda Dawson vs Paula Cochran / Christine Mccorquodale7-5, 6-3
2026-04-16vs Ma.Schantz40AWon 31
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Debra Neville vs Stacey Jacobs / Laurie Parker0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Suzanne Brown6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCornelia Shaw / Cayt Kirkman vs Wanda Wilson / Cindy McCullough7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Gupton / Tina Jones vs Malinda Schantz / Whitley Morris7-5, 7-5
2026-04-09vs Yv.Barrow40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesDebra Neville / Luann Richardson vs Meghan Paris / Melissa Burke2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Jennifer Badham1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Dawson / Cornelia Shaw vs Yvonne Barrow / Brooke Jenkins0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJaime Gaskins / Kelly Day vs April Taylor / Sarah Newton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Ta.LeFevre40ALost 13
W#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Sarah Bell / Kellie Snider7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Sonet Weber0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Debra Neville vs Tara LeFevre / Debra Phillips7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Lyle / Marlea Ward vs Laura Caldwell / Beth Johnson2-6, 0-6
2026-03-26vs Ka.Percy40ALost 13
L#1 DoublesAmanda Dawson / Gina Goldthwaite vs Stacey Giglio / Kathryn Kiel6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Rebekah Mcconnell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Marlea Ward vs Marilyn Slaymaker / Katie Percy0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Lyle / Shelly Rogers vs Kate Pirrung / Alexandra Kovacs1-6, 0-6
2026-03-19vs Ch.Jenkins40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson vs Elise Hamilton / Jennifer Holloman4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGina Goldthwaite vs Lorraine Hall1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCayt Kirkman / Debra Neville vs Jennifer Brock / Anna Jane Franklin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Day / Marlea Ward vs Lisa Kempf / Laura Munster2-6, 1-6
2026-03-12vs Ra.Mills40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson vs Helen Strickland / Michelle Welborn2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Lauren Hardwick2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Jaime Gaskins vs Ashley Kerr / Stephanie Tracey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCayt Kirkman / Debra Neville vs Cooper Thornhill / Katherine Bratton5-7, 1-6
2026-03-05vs Su.Newton40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Wendy Hanshew / Kara Hornada3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Amy Rogers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Dawson / Debra Neville vs Angie Bostrom / Beth McKinley4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings36 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ch.Jenkins40A10034614200
2Bi.Trigilio40A91281230305
3Ta.LeFevre40A91261431269
4Na.Regan40A82281230289
5Sa.Highsmith40A82271332292
6Je.Anderson40A7125717202
7La.Redmond40A71221021209
8Ju.Kelly40A71221024222
9De.Lange40A71211129244
10Ke.Townsend40A73271336358
11Al.Sheehan40A73221841346
12Kr.Gilreath40A3.56224820233
13Ka.Percy40A64251538321
14Su.Knowles40A64231741336
15Su.Newton40A64192145349
16Je.Komes40A3.553181434292
17As.McCollum40A53151739296
18Ra.Mills40A55211939316
19De.Turner40A55211943373
20Je.Wolborsky40A3.555162450373
21De.Lape40A44131939286
22Yv.Barrow40A46202047344
23Kr.Welsh40A37182252395
24Sa.Wilhelmy40A26171536302
25Ke.Sutton40A26102246329
26Di.Williams40A28152553392
27Ly.Clark40A28142656426
28Te.Paschaloudis40A28112958433
29Sh.Cole40A28132760412
30Pa.Cochran40A28112961417
31St.Grose40A1691941291
32Ma.Hellner40A17102251341
33Me.Everitt40A1782451363
34Ma.Schantz40A19122858430
35Ju.Sauls40A1993165438
36Me.Kofod40A0762247306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Luann Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.11
Teressa Paschaloudis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Gina Goldthwaite
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Sarah Overholser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Karen Gupton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Cayt Kirkman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Shelly Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Cornelia Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Marlea Ward
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.76
Debra Neville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.52
Jaime Gaskins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luann Richardson + Marlea Ward6258% games+6.8% vs expected
Teressa Paschaloudis + Cornelia Shaw51441% games+3.1% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Teressa Paschaloudis253547% games+0.9% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Karen Gupton2442% gamesnot enough data
Debra Neville + Cayt Kirkman0537% gamesnot enough data
Luann Richardson + Cornelia Shaw134 matchesnot enough data
Marlea Ward + Karen Gupton134 matchesnot enough data
Debra Neville + Teressa Paschaloudis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Luann Richardson
83W–111L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Teressa Paschaloudis
56W–96L career · 8 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gina Goldthwaite
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 8 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Karen Gupton
63W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Cayt Kirkman
75W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Shelly Rogers
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Cornelia Shaw
34W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Marlea Ward
60W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Debra Neville
2W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Jaime Gaskins
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.