Teams

MTC Downing

2021 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-05vs Raintree FallinWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoy Lareau / Thayer Baird vs Lisa Harmon / Valerie Caldwell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-13vs Raintree FallinLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy Lareau / Gale Tune vs Janice McGarity / Valerie Caldwell2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Thagard / Peggy McElgunn vs Xianghong Li / Denise Moore2-6, 5-7
2021-06-24vs ACAC StallardSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJeannie Langnau / Peggy McElgunn vs Judiann Drash / Karen Stallard3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoy Lareau / Thayer Baird vs Suzy Weber / Shannon Scarvey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-03vs Willow Oaks JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy McElgunn / Patricia Thagard vs Laurie Huizenga / Teresa Given7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Joy Lareau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Cindy Eramian
published 4
Hanna Mogilnicka
published 4
3.55
Diana Duddy
published 4
3.48
Jeannie Langnau
published
3.46
Peggy McElgunn
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Laurie Miller
published
Marilyn Downing
published
Maureen McGrath
published
Nancy Reynolds
published
Sandra Farrow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen McGrath + Cindy Eramian5060% gamesnot enough data
Jeannie Langnau + Nancy Reynolds404 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Downing + Nancy Reynolds134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joy Lareau
85W–99L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Cindy Eramian
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Hanna Mogilnicka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Diana Duddy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jeannie Langnau
12W–21L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Peggy McElgunn
144W–170L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Marilyn Downing
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen McGrath
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Reynolds
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Farrow
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.