Teams

BCC - Knight

2025 Lynchburg Combo Mixed · Lynchburg Combo Mixed 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-13vs OCC - Fraser - Mixed BlessingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsi Justice / James Neel vs Grace Petty / Scott Englund6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Knight / Jason Bivens vs Jamie Megginson / Keith Higar6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCheryl Betz / Peter Betz vs Teresa Boylan / Michael Jacob2-6, 2-6
2025-11-02vs OCC - Fraser - Mixed BlessingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsi Justice / Jason Bivens vs Rachel Love / Scott Englund3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGrey Adams / James Neel vs Teresa Boylan / Jason Page6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Betz / Peter Betz vs Jamie Megginson / Stuart Kettinger7-5, 7-6
2025-10-27vs OCC - Fraser - Mixed BlessingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesStuart Tinsley / Grey Adams vs Scott Englund / Grace Petty4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJames Neel / Julie Clark vs Rachel Love / Keith Higar6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Knight / Andrew Beverly vs Bob Bailey / Maria Roberts7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Kelsi Justice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
James Neel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Peter Betz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Andrew Beverly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Kelly Knight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Cheryl Betz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Grey Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Bivens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Tinsley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Betz + Cheryl Betz2446% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Tinsley + Grey Adams3256% gamesnot enough data
Kelsi Justice + James Neel5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsi Justice
20W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
4.15
4
James Neel
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Peter Betz
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Andrew Beverly
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Kelly Knight
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Cheryl Betz
21W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Grey Adams
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Jason Bivens
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Clark
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stuart Tinsley
28W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.