Teams

WTC- 40 Mixed 4.0

2025 Dothan USTA Mixed 40 & Over Summer · 4.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-23vs DO - BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohnny Cook / Angie Mcdaniel vs William McRae / Meg Castleberry1-2
L#2 DoublesMary Brown / Robert Lee vs Natacha Phillips / Derek Cotton1-6, 2-6
2025-07-16vs DO - BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Collins / Jeremy Danzie vs Robert Abbott / Ashley Edmonds6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarie Crowley / Robert Lee vs Brandon Bachman / Tricia Hafdahl0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohnny Cook / Angie Mcdaniel vs Amy Brown / Brad Brown0-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs DO - BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarie Crowley / Robert Lee vs Brandon Bachman / Tricia Hafdahl0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohnny Cook / Angie Mcdaniel vs Amy Brown / Brad Brown1-6, 1-6
2025-06-24vs DO - BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohnny Cook / Carie Crowley vs Amy Brown / Derek Cotton0-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesMartha Collins / Jeremy Danzie vs Robert Abbott / Ashley Edmonds2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DO - Brown40111221
2WTC- 40 Mixed 4.00411123141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jeremy Danzie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Martha Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Mary Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Lisa Howard
published
3.24
Carie Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Johnny Cook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Angie Mcdaniel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johnny Cook + Angie Mcdaniel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Danzie
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.88
Martha Collins
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Mary Brown
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Lisa Howard
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Carie Crowley
19W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Johnny Cook
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Angie Mcdaniel
14W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.