Teams

SFV Paseo Crazy Aces

SFV-Mixed 18 & Over · SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-21vs SFV Mixed UpLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Richardson / Mel Matibag vs Matthew Barbor / Carrie Gasper6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-15vs SFV PVCC-Diverse Too!Won 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Roman Kuperman vs Christopher Camp / Jennifer Hayden6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCraig Scarbrough / Amy Hasquet vs Kevin Finkelberg / Keiko Kato Verrier2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Patricia Dunn
published
3.85
3.83
Alain Banas
published 4
3.65
Jackie Steffen
published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Edward Hatch
published 4
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Mel Matibag
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Jorge Perazzo
published
3.06
Janine Baker
published
2.88
Lara Docherty
published
Jaron McDonnel
published
Monique Reyes
published
Roman Kuperman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TANIA JANICEK + Mel Matibag134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Dunn
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Alain Banas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jackie Steffen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 5 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Edward Hatch
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.37
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Mel Matibag
46W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Jorge Perazzo
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
Lara Docherty
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88
Jaron McDonnel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Monique Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roman Kuperman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.