Teams

LTFC GREEN

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-14vs RRTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Beard / Sheri Ovitt vs Devon Turnick / Karen Terry6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Marle / Emily Marle vs Matt Yeingst / Emily Yeingst6-2, 6-2
2023-05-07vs SS-LT BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrett Beard / Lisa Lash vs Trevor Van Wyk / Angie Van Wyk6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Marle / Emily Marle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-30vs EM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrett Beard / Tina Burton vs Andy Wurst / Erica Roybal7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-23vs CPV GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Beard / Sheri Ovitt vs John Anderson / Susan Boerema2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMitchell Kaplan / Lisa Lash vs Edward Budd / Andrea Smart6-2, 6-2
2023-04-16vs KNO REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMitchell Kaplan / Lisa Lash vs Kevin Pilkington / Barb Richards6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Marle / Peter Marle vs Tyler Chafee / Jessica Hunt6-2, 6-3
2023-04-09vs RRTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Beard / Alena Sukhovetskyy vs Devon Turnick / Rebecca Boxer2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Marle / Emily Marle vs Sergio Blumenblat / Sonia Blumenblat6-3, 6-1
2023-04-02vs SS-LT BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrett Beard / Lisa Lash vs Ann Reidy / Patrick Reidy4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEmily Marle / Peter Marle vs Angie Van Wyk / Trevor Van Wyk6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Emily Marle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Peter Marle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.13
Brett Beard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.13
Lisa Lash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Tina Burton
published
2.91
Mitchell Kaplan
published
2.69
Jeffrey Burton
published
Steve Rolles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Marle + Peter Marle29965% games+13.5% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Mitchell Kaplan7652% games−3.3% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Brett Beard4446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Marle
87W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3
Peter Marle
109W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Brett Beard
104W–93L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Lisa Lash
102W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Tina Burton
39W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Mitchell Kaplan
28W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jeffrey Burton
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Steve Rolles
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.