Teams

McMullen Framers

2022 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-12vs ELW ChristisonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Brandon Halm vs Jillene Davis / Caleb Hirsch6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs Seminole Lake RamdeenWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Brandon Halm vs Irene Nasworthy / Mark Nasworthy7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-15vs Safety Harbor PasinskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Hilbert / Davina Doletzky vs Brad Armagost / Lisa Hueholt4-6, 5-7
2022-05-01vs YMCA PerrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Halm / Lisa Oonk vs Brian Polak / Chieko Perry0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Rossi / Lita Hollister vs Bill Calafiura / Amy Brooks6-3, 6-4
2022-04-24vs SPTC Holliday 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLita Hollister / Michael Rossi vs Andre Kashou / Amy Bodine6-4, 6-3
2022-04-10vs Seminole Lake TimminsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGreg Hilbert / Davina Doletzky vs James Grandfield / Gina Timmins4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Plunkett / Lita Hollister vs Craig McLeod / Tiffany Rhodes2-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs ELW OrrLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Hilbert / Donna Small vs Daniel Zantedeschi / Karin Hartenbach4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTroy IronWing / Lisa Oonk vs Kyle Valby / Sigrid Bratic1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Michael Rossi
published
3.76
Lance Hill
published
3.75
Cambria Whalen
published 4
3.56
Greg Hilbert
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.45
Lita Hollister
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Garrett Prochaska
published 3.5
3.12
Karen Fischer
published
3.10
Davina Doletzky
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Hilbert + Davina Doletzky134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Oonk
217W–232L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Michael Rossi
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lance Hill
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Cambria Whalen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Greg Hilbert
25W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
4
Lita Hollister
78W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Garrett Prochaska
25W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Karen Fischer
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Davina Doletzky
43W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.