← Teams

Lov2 Lob

2022 Baltimore Mixed 55 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 55 & Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-05vs Mixed SuccessSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesEva Simmons-O'Brien / James Smoot vs Virginia Fung / Jie Cheng3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeraldine Klauber / J Blue vs Marcella Miller / Samuel Miller6-4, 6-1
2022-07-30vs Mixed SuccessSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesEva Simmons-O'Brien / James Smoot vs Patricia Stavros / Jacob Zylberberg3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Herve Franceschi vs Lisa McIntire / DONALD CRAWLEY1-6, 3-6
2022-07-08Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Herve Franceschi vs Karen Robinson / Walter Parrish5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAlicia Ault / David Pessin vs Connie Bird / Eric Bass2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-25vs Mixed SuccessSplit 1–1
L#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Steven Salzberg vs Virginia Fung / Jie Cheng1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGeraldine Klauber / J Blue vs Marcella Miller / Samuel Miller1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-17vs Mixed SuccessLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Smoot / Eva Simmons-O'Brien vs Lee Wroe / Gail Zylberberg1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Ault / David Pessin vs Walter Parrish / Karen Robinson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / James Barry vs Susie Chung / Samuel Miller1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-11vs Mixed SuccessLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Klauber / J Blue vs Virginia Fung / Jie Cheng4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 55 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
James Smoot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Geraldine Klauber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
David Johns
published 4
3.68
Anne Blue
published 4
3.59
Alicia Ault
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
J Blue
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Klauber + James Smoot3–14 matchesnot enough data
James Smoot + Alicia Ault2–24 matchesnot enough data
James Smoot + Eva Simmons-O'Brien1–23 matchesnot enough data
James Smoot + Terri Mrozinski0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Geraldine Klauber
149W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
4
David Johns
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Anne Blue
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Alicia Ault
75W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Eva Simmons-O'Brien
79W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
J Blue
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.