Teams

Tri Wait

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-02vs Aloha SmashWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate MacKeigan / Yoshie Groves vs Hitomi Yokoyama / Satsuki Morales6-1, 6-1
2025-07-26vs TyakiWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnalyn Picken / Kate MacKeigan vs Alohalani Slover / Shoko Burkett7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-19vs Lei’d Back LadiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnalyn Picken / Jamia Arner vs Alpana Khairom / Jin Smith6-3, 6-4
2025-07-13vs AiyaLost 01
L#1 DoublesYoshie Groves / Jamia Arner vs Noelle Chun / Erin Jyo7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-06vs OC Just2PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Sandon / Jamia Arner vs Karen Lar Rieu / April Blauser6-1, 6-2
2025-06-29vs Warrior PrincessLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Sandon / Kate MacKeigan vs Jordyn Tanaka / Alyssa Watanabe4-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs Pair-adise CityLost 01
L#1 DoublesJamia Arner / Erin Sandon vs Sally Morin / Kathleen Rubio4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Warrior Princess7070145
2Aiya6161550
3Tyaki4343648
4Tri Wait4343760
5Pair-adise City3434866
6Aloha Smash25251174
7OC Just2Play16161278
8Lei’d Back Ladies16161279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Yoshie Groves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Jamia Arner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Annalyn Picken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Erin Sandon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Kate MacKeigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Maria Frostic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamia Arner + Erin Sandon10658% games+2.4% vs expected
Kate MacKeigan + Jamia Arner3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yoshie Groves
35W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Jamia Arner
55W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Annalyn Picken
27W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Erin Sandon
93W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kate MacKeigan
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Maria Frostic
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.