Teams

PWilson

2022 Capital Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-11vs IMSTEERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Collins / Stephen Mungenast vs Lyman Smith / Bob Graney0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPete Prodan / Subhash Tannan vs Harry Nicholos / Rick Hall6-0, 6-2
2022-10-04vs IMSTEERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Collins / Stephen Mungenast vs Gregory McKenna / Bob Graney2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPete Prodan / Subhash Tannan vs Ken Schuster / John Gripman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-27vs IMSTEERLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Collins / Jay Gallagher vs Gregory McKenna / Ali Regimand1-6, 1-6
2022-09-20vs IMSTEERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTracy Behar / Roger Parro vs Philip Westerman / Bob Graney5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Collins / Jay Gallagher vs Gregory McKenna / Steve Brown6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-13Split 11
L#2 DoublesJim Snell / Jay Gallagher vs Lyman Smith / John Gripman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPete Prodan / Subhash Tannan vs Dennis Vick / George Dixon6-3, 6-4
2022-09-06vs IMSTEERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephen Mungenast / William Collins vs Philip Westerman / Ali Regimand2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPete Prodan / Mark Zorko vs Ken Schuster / Rick Hall4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-08-30Split 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Behar / Subhash Tannan vs Harry Nicholos / John Doe3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJim Snell / Jay Gallagher vs Ken Schuster / Steve Brown6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Tracy Behar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Pete Prodan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jay Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Stephen Mungenast
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Roger Parro
published
2.62
Mark Zorko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mark Levy
published
Paul Wilson
published
Subhash Tannan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Prodan + Stephen Mungenast224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Behar
66W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Pete Prodan
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Jay Gallagher
78W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Stephen Mungenast
94W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Roger Parro
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Mark Zorko
36W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Mark Levy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Wilson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Subhash Tannan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.