Teams

IE-LLW-Sesilie Kay

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-05vs IE-SLCC-Michele WalterSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeidi Brun / Nanette Pratini vs Sally Schwartz / Cesaria Vazquez6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Amy Garrett vs Jane Whitney / Kim Jensen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-16vs IE-SLCC-Michele WalterSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSara Aschmann / Nanette Pratini vs Jane Whitney / Laura Emerson7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Tammy Pronenko / Catherine Leogrande6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs IE-SLCC-Michele WalterLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Sally Schwartz / Cesaria Vazquez2-6, 5-7
2021-04-11Split 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Cristina Reed / Laura Emerson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Denise Stewart vs Sally Schwartz / Michele Walter0-6, 2-6
2021-04-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesTera Walker / Sesilie Kay vs Elizabeth Gallegos / Michele Walter6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Heidi Brun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Nanette Pratini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Elizabeth Rydall
published 3
2.73
Annette Flores
published 3
2.73
Sesilie Kay
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jeannie Adair
published
Kathy Reeves
published
Sara Aschmann
published
Shelley Mellentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sesilie Kay + Heidi Brun6350% games+0.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Rydall + Heidi Brun6259% gamesnot enough data
Sesilie Kay + Nanette Pratini1436% gamesnot enough data
Nanette Pratini + Heidi Brun3256% gamesnot enough data
Sesilie Kay + Elizabeth Rydall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Nanette Pratini
28W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Elizabeth Rydall
105W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sesilie Kay
134W–145L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Jeannie Adair
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy Reeves
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sara Aschmann
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.