Teams

Londer/Goldfine- Overserved 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-09vs Stromberg- Smash Squad 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesJenny Javitch / Sarah Jackson vs Katy Petersen / Brook Holzinger6-1, 6-1
2023-02-16vs Culligan- Crushers 18+ W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesLorie Korpi / Sarah Jackson vs Annie Kelby / Kay Larson6-3, 6-1
2023-02-09vs Schoenecker 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Jackson / Anne Dean vs Sarah Reinhart / Kimberly Gehant6-2, 6-0
2023-01-26vs Dahl- Slice Girls 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Jackson / Anne Dean vs Julie Dahl / Linda Hauser6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Rebecca Lieberman
published
3.03
Jenny Javitch
published
2.98
Sherri Nichols
published
2.93
2.91
Pamela Londer
published
2.91
Sara Goldfine
published
2.90
Raleigh Miller
published
2.89
Allison Perry
published 3
2.88
Lorie Korpi
published
2.88
Jodi Lipschultz
published
2.84
Amanda Getchell
published 3
2.79
Sarah Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Jill Miller
published
2.43
Elyse Scheuer
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Javitch + Jodi Lipschultz9259% games+1.4% vs expected
Amanda Getchell + Allison Perry11455% games+0.5% vs expected
Sherri Nichols + Lorie Korpi5068% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Jackson + Rebecca Lieberman404 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Lipschultz + Sarah Jackson213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Jackson + Pamela Londer213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Goldfine + Pamela Londer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Lieberman
19W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jenny Javitch
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Sherri Nichols
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Andrea Golden Fineblum
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
Pamela Londer
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.91
Sara Goldfine
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.91
Raleigh Miller
18W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Allison Perry
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Lorie Korpi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jodi Lipschultz
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Amanda Getchell
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
Sarah Jackson
83W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Jill Miller
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Elyse Scheuer
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%71%29%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.