Teams

Fleming

2022 Harford Adult 18 & Over · Harford Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-21vs Rodano/ThomasLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Wille / Miriam Meller vs Barbara Helm / Kathleen Dolan2-6, 1-6
2022-06-20vs Rodano/ThomasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Seidl / Eeva Stenger vs Barbara Helm / Diane Carson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Pettus / Kristin Seidl vs Joelle Rodano / Barbara Helm6-2, 6-3
2022-05-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wille / Sara Cabrera vs Joelle Rodano / Barbara Helm6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-21vs Rodano/ThomasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wille / Eeva Stenger vs Rebecca Pape / Diane Carson6-2, 6-3
2022-05-15vs Rodano/ThomasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wille / Kristin Seidl vs Tina Brown / Bonnie Thomas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-12vs Rodano/ThomasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Wille / Kathy Pettus vs Tina Brown / Diane Carson6-1, 6-0
2022-05-10vs Rodano/ThomasLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Carmen / Katie Wille vs Barbara Helm / Lama Shikani3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Sara Cabrera vs Christine Boyce / Kathleen Dolan6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kathy Pettus
published
3.38
Katie Wille
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Sara Cabrera
published 3.5
3.29
Miriam Meller
published
3.24
Casey Palmer
published 3.5
3.22
Ashley Archibald
published 3.5
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Janet Handy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Seidl + Katie Wille7160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Pettus
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.79
3.5
Katie Wille
59W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Sara Cabrera
59W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Miriam Meller
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Casey Palmer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Archibald
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Janet Handy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.