Teams

Parker/JB/JCC

2026 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 20 2:00 PM
Jonesboro Country Club
Sep 28 6:00 PM
Jonesboro Country Club
Oct 12 6:00 PM
Jonesboro Country Club
2026-09-08vs DiGaetano/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Parker / Renee Cobern vs Jacqueline Gammill / Jocelyn Johnson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTamara Lee / Stefanie Rouse vs Tara Smith / Himaja Balakrishnan6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Wenger / Jessica Blackburn vs Shelly Little / Ellen Lawrence1-6, 1-6
2026-08-24vs Cissell/JB/APCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesTera Harpole / Stefanie Rouse vs Gloria Faircloth / Sarah Milton0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Wenger / Tamara Lee vs Kelli Adkins / Megan Neugebauer5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Guinn / Tiffany Floyd vs Jenny Rogers / Julie Rogers0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-26Won 10
W#3 SinglesTamara Lee vs Holly Robertson6-2, 6-1
2024-11-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesTamara Lee vs Linda Smith6-1, 7-5
2024-10-21vs DiGaetano/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#1 SinglesTamara Lee vs Tanya Ellington3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Jocelyn Johnson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiGaetano/JB/3Oaks000000
2Sandusky/Roberts/JB/3Oaks000000
3Parker/JB/JCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Nicole Townsend
published
2.77
Margaret Guinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Tamara Lee
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.54
Angie Fegtly
published 3
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Renee Cobern
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Tera Harpole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Alyssa Wenger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lauren Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Lee + Renee Cobern4354% games+12.3% vs expected
Tera Harpole + Renee Cobern044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Townsend
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Margaret Guinn
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Tamara Lee
22W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.75
3
Angie Fegtly
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Tiffany Floyd
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Renee Cobern
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Tera Harpole
27W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
3
Alyssa Wenger
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.37
Lauren Parker
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.