Teams

KY/BG/HARLAN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER REGIONAL · 4.0 MEN - WK REGIONAL

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-08vs KY\HEN\RobinsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesWade Stone / Shahbaz Munawar vs Chris Robinson / Michael Williams7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJim Latham / Jonathan Miller vs Shaun Skelton / Jonathan Weyer6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChad Young vs Britt Decker6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrad Hales / Nate Harlan vs Rennie Silen / Paul Dickman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-08vs KY\HEN\RobinsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaxon Grover / Milton Crawford vs David Scott Morgan / Daniel May6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrad Hales / Nate Harlan vs Rennie Silen / Jonathan Weyer6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJim Latham / Jonathan Miller vs Andrew Liu / Shaun Skelton1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-04vs KY\HEN\RobinsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJaxon Grover / Shahbaz Munawar vs Daniel May / Michael Williams6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWade Stone / Milton Crawford vs David Scott Morgan / Chris Robinson6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesChad Young vs Paul Dickman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Hales / Nate Harlan vs Andrew Liu / Dustin Stilwell6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 MEN - WK REGIONAL
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/BG/HARLAN219613128
2KY\HEN\Robinson126920157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brad Hales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Nate Harlan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chad Young
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Jaxon Grover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Shahbaz Munawar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Latham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Milton Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wade Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaxon Grover + Nate Harlan2543% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hales + Nate Harlan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Hales
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Nate Harlan
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Chad Young
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jaxon Grover
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Shahbaz Munawar
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Jim Latham
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Milton Crawford
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wade Stone
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.