Teams

SD 4.5 Barnes TC 9AM/ Crisafulli

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.55 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristie Alva vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Barnett / Kristie Alva vs Christina Irinco / Caroline Emhardt6-1, 6-1
2021-05-07vs SD 4.5 LLW Barnes TC/ JaquezLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Malhame / Diane Ghiron vs Shelley Goodson / Karyn McCartney1-6, 2-6
2021-05-05vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC 9AM / GallegoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Diane Ghiron vs Kathleen Lacey / Amy Endres7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Sundi Olson vs Michelle May / Carol Donahue6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristie Alva / Yoke Tanko vs Prentiss van Den Berg / Maria Nunez6-4, 6-1
2021-04-29vs SD 4.5 LLW Barnes TC/ JaquezSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTeri Stevens / Kristie Alva vs Shelley Goodson / Kristine Cassar7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAdele Psyllos / Adria Hilsdorf vs Allison Sterett / Valerie Tan3-6, 3-6
2021-04-15vs SD 4.5 Coronado TC 9AM/ Mc BrideLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Sundi Olson vs Amy Repetti / Alexia Palacios-Peters4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-08vs SD 4.5 LLW Barnes TC/ JaquezLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristie Alva / Brianna Sullivan vs Dolores Ilko / Robin Hubbard6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Crisafulli / Adele Psyllos vs Karyn McCartney / Tiffinie Harpster3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Shari Hume vs Allison Sterett / Tiffany Kellogg6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-01vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC 9AM / GallegoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Ruth Young vs Michelle May / Carol Donahue6-7, 1-6
2021-03-25vs SD 4.5 Coronado TC 9AM/ Mc BrideWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Sundi Olson vs Alexia Palacios-Peters / Amy Repetti6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristie Alva / Adria Hilsdorf vs Jaimie Centeno / Sari Rudy7-5, 6-0
2021-03-18vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC 9AM / GallegoWon 20
W#2 DoublesDiane Ghiron / Mary Malhame vs Cheri Quesenberry / Amy Endres6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Britney Ewing vs Kathleen Lacey / Lauren Weiner6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Kristie Alva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.39
Brianna Sullivan
published 4.5
4.36
Mary Malhame
published 4.5
4.34
Lisa Crisafulli
published 4.5
4.33
Britney Ewing
published 4.5
4.27
Laura Steenstra
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Adele Psyllos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Masako Wilson
published 4.5
4.12
Adria Hilsdorf
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Shari Hume
published
4.07
Diane Ghiron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Sundi Olson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Ruth Young
published
Teri Stevens
published
Vicky Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Steenstra + Sundi Olson683754% games+2.5% vs expected
Mary Malhame + Diane Ghiron151055% games−0.5% vs expected
Lisa Crisafulli + Adele Psyllos7358% games−0.5% vs expected
Masako Wilson + Adria Hilsdorf2347% gamesnot enough data
Laura Steenstra + Adele Psyllos303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Malhame + Lisa Crisafulli213 matchesnot enough data
Adria Hilsdorf + Adele Psyllos123 matchesnot enough data
Diane Ghiron + Adele Psyllos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kristie Alva
60W–26L career · 6 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Brianna Sullivan
12W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Mary Malhame
48W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Lisa Crisafulli
92W–59L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Britney Ewing
13W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Laura Steenstra
168W–92L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Adele Psyllos
83W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Masako Wilson
58W–40L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Adria Hilsdorf
73W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
Shari Hume
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Sundi Olson
125W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
Ruth Young
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Teri Stevens
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicky Wolfe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.