Teams

WI Tri Alpha M Summer Singles MALT Wang

2024 WI Other · WI Tri Alpha Summer Singles Men

3 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · WI Tri Alpha Summer Singles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Alpha M Summer Singles MALT Leventhal72131430220
2WI Tri Alpha M Summer Singles MALT Czarnecki45101736248
3WI Tri Alpha M Summer Singles MALT Wang36111635243
4WI Tri Alpha M Summer Singles MALT Boregowda3681939271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Max Bohn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.60
Majid Afshar
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Xiaotong Wang
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Bohn
67W–48L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.51
Majid Afshar
21W–50L career · 18 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Xiaotong Wang
14W–6L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.