Teams

Teays Valley Prince

2025 OH OV FALL Combo Charleston · 2025 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs TIC SuttonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Delcotto / Noah Fulks vs Matthew Sutton / JJ Casto7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJay Cooke / James Mcintosh vs Jon Hoh / Grayson Millette6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-25vs TIC SuttonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNoah Fulks / Joshua Lawson vs Ryan Mullins / Matthew Sutton5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlec Foote / Thomas Orcutt vs John Bowman / Andrew Elliot2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Prince / Brian Delcotto vs Grayson Millette / Tanner Whipkey6-4, 6-2
2025-10-12vs TIC SuttonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlec Foote / Thomas Orcutt vs Christopher Ritchie / Matthew Sutton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJay Cooke / Noah Fulks vs Brian McCutcheon / Tanner Whipkey7-6, 6-2
2025-09-26vs TIC SuttonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaymes Haggerty / Brandon Gwinn vs Matthew Sutton / Christopher Ritchie6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Prince / Brian Delcotto vs Jon Hoh / Brian McCutcheon6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJames Mcintosh / Joshua Lawson vs Ryan Mullins / JJ Casto6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 8.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Teays Valley Prince40102788
2TIC Sutton0421021139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alec Foote
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
James Mcintosh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Jaymes Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Noah Fulks
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.85
Brian Delcotto
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Brandon Gwinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jason Prince
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jay Cooke
published
Joshua Lawson
published
Thomas Orcutt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alec Foote
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
James Mcintosh
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaymes Haggerty
15W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
Noah Fulks
24W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
4.5
Brian Delcotto
33W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Brandon Gwinn
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Prince
23W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Cooke
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Lawson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Orcutt
42W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.