Teams

Denne/IS

2024 TUL MIXED 55 & Over League · 8.0 MIXED

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-01vs Tasker/PHWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Amon / Janet Chambers vs Ronnie Acebo / Dana Dudley6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesScott Hartfelder / Kathy Blackim vs Mark Lehman / Kimberly Jones7-5, 6-1
2024-07-14vs OK/Anne Wood/Mixed 55&over8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Crowley / Sandy Stoner vs Gary Broxterman / Carey Freeman3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Borgstrom / Kathy Blackim vs Bob Berlien / Renee Pascale6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Pearson / Shelley Bradshaw vs Fred Lueck / Marisa New2-6, 2-6
2024-06-21vs OK/Anne Wood/Mixed 55&over8.0XWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandy Stoner / Michael Pearson vs Terri Ogle / Kevin Hill0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Chambers / Bill Chambers vs Anne Wood / Fred Lueck4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Blackim / David Allen Clonts vs Michele Hill / Michael Thagard6-2, 6-3
2024-06-14vs Tasker/PHLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Allen Clonts / Jennifer Hartfelder vs Mary Jo Tasker / Scott Hjelm4-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesJanet Chambers / Bill Chambers vs H Treak Tasker / Kimberly Oliver4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Borgstrom / Tina Dickman vs Gail Gillock / Thomas Gillock3-6, 2-6
2024-06-02vs OK/Anne Wood/Mixed 55&over8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Borgstrom / Shelley Bradshaw vs Matthew Kutch / Cindy Hendrick3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Pearson / Kathy Blackim vs Fred Lueck / Anne Wood2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLee Crowley / Jennifer Hartfelder vs Gary Broxterman / Carey Freeman6-2, 6-4
2024-05-17vs Tasker/PHWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelinda Clonts / Michael Pearson vs Kerry Taylor / Mark Lehman6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShelley Bradshaw / Scott Hartfelder vs Gail Gillock / Thomas Gillock6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Chambers / Bill Chambers vs Dana Dudley / Ronnie Acebo6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Anne Wood/Mixed 55&over8.0X4211716140
2Denne/IS3381023175
3Tasker/PH2481023163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Janet Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
J Denne
published
3.46
Scott Hartfelder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Michael Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Kathy Blackim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.33
Jeff Borgstrom
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Lee Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
David Allen Clonts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
David Amon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Bill Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Sandy Stoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Edna Hird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Melinda Clonts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Shelley Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Hartfelder
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tina Dickman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Blackim + Jeff Borgstrom4649% games+3.5% vs expected
Scott Hartfelder + Kathy Blackim6654% games−6.2% vs expected
David Amon + Sandy Stoner1544% games−16.3% vs expected
Shelley Bradshaw + David Amon1736% gamesnot enough data
Scott Hartfelder + Shelley Bradshaw3447% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Borgstrom + Shelley Bradshaw4353% gamesnot enough data
Scott Hartfelder + Sandy Stoner3255% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Blackim + David Amon1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Chambers
74W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.93
J Denne
72W–38L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Scott Hartfelder
127W–87L career · 4 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Michael Pearson
80W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
Kathy Blackim
137W–137L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.35
Jeff Borgstrom
57W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Lee Crowley
73W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
David Allen Clonts
32W–35L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Amon
39W–70L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Bill Chambers
39W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sandy Stoner
70W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Edna Hird
55W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Melinda Clonts
23W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.96
Shelley Bradshaw
101W–140L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Jennifer Hartfelder
67W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Dickman
36W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.