Teams

2-DHenley-HVCC

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-04vs 3-DBaddour-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Sean Selig vs Paul Hodulik / William Enright1-6, 4-6
2023-09-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Alex Herzick vs Asim Javaid / Sid Thakur5-7, 6-7
2023-09-18vs 3-DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Alex Herzick vs Brian Jenkins / Brice Englert6-2, 6-2
2023-08-28vs 3-DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Nixon / Alex Herzick vs Jeff Tillman / Matt Moody6-1, 6-0
2023-08-21vs 1-NPuri-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Mohit Bhatnagar / Asim Javaid4-6, 2-6
2023-08-19vs 3-DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Christian Shelby / William Enright4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-02vs 1-NPuri-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Nixon / Bryson Powell vs Sandeep Verghese / Asim Javaid3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Justin Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Bryson Powell
published 4
3.61
RICHARD GRIFFIN
published
3.59
Alex Herzick
published 3.5
3.56
Sean Selig
published
3.46
William Hodges
published
3.35
John Burkert
published
3.26
Chris Hamilton
published 3.5
David Kreeger
published 3.5
3.23
Benjamin Feldman
published 3.5
2.88
Evan Selig
published
Walker Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hamilton + Alex Herzick4157% games+1.5% vs expected
Justin Nixon + Alex Herzick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Nixon
43W–30L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Bryson Powell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
RICHARD GRIFFIN
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Alex Herzick
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
Sean Selig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
William Hodges
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
John Burkert
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Chris Hamilton
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
David Kreeger
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Benjamin Feldman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Evan Selig
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Walker Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.