Teams

SD LLW 9.0 Peninsula TC/ Martinez

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesJed Galan / Tiffany Kellogg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-18vs SD 9.0 Balboa TC/ GlennWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Deborah Lee-Tep vs Beth Sharratt / Justin Turrentine6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-04vs SD 9.0 UCRC/ SeelingerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Jeff Ray vs Eric Alm / Gabrielle Bartolome7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJed Galan / Carla Zarbo vs Claudia Roehr / Andrew Tek7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsay Brown / Joseph Barraquio vs Jackie Pelletier / Grayson Turley6-4, 6-0
2023-01-22vs SD 9.0 Balboa TC/ GlennWon 20
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Martinez / Jed Galan vs David Moore / Linda Milburn6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSakda Kethdy / Lindsay Brown vs Justin Turrentine / Beth Sharratt6-4, 6-0
2023-01-21vs SD 9.0 Mtn View/ NavarroWon 10
W#3 DoublesSakda Kethdy / Deborah Lee-Tep vs Voltaire Navarro / Joan Yngson6-3, 6-0
2023-01-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Jonathan Coyle vs Jackie Pelletier / Grayson Turley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.00
Andras Bori
published 5
4.97
Deborah Lee-Tep
published 5
4.58
Priscilla Martinez
published
4.50
Antonio Hernandez
published 4.5
4.38
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Carla Zarbo
published 4.5
4.02
Joseph Barraquio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Jed Galan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Sakda Kethdy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeff Ray
published
Jonathan Coyle
published
Margaret Hudson
published
Ronald Kao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Zarbo + Joseph Barraquio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andras Bori
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
5.00
5
Deborah Lee-Tep
14W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.97
Priscilla Martinez
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Antonio Hernandez
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Carla Zarbo
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Joseph Barraquio
100W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Jed Galan
160W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Sakda Kethdy
75W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
Jeff Ray
20W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Coyle
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Hudson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Kao
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.